Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These SAM METZ Associated Press results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 556 hits. Analysis detected 2,235 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,346 authors). This SAM METZ Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
SAM METZ Associated Press
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%SAM METZ Associated Press (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,676
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.0%6.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 20.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos