ABC News22%

Iran hits US allies as Israel warns missiles headed for Jordan could land on its territory 43%

By JON GAMBRELL Associated Press0% SAM METZ Associated Press0%

7/19/2026, 3:52:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 410 hits. Analysis detected 1,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 892 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.7% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,511 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the article peer group.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- The U.S. military launched airstrikes Sunday targeting Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard to retaliate for the killing of American troops in Jordan, further widening the exchange of fire between them as an interim deal seeking an end to their war has collapsed. 
The strikes are part of a weeklong campaign that began with a struggle over control of the Strait of Hormuz and has seen Iran strike U.S.-allied countries across the Middle East. 
The U.S. has targeted bridges, electrical facilities and other targets in Iran, and Tehran has retaliated by hitting power and desalination plants in Kuwait, threatening daily life in that small, oil-rich desert nation. 
Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain again activated air defenses Sunday morning as they warned of incoming Iranian drones and missiles. 
Israel warned Iran missiles launched toward neighboring Jordan could cause fire to spill over into its territory for the first time since fighting reignited. 
The U.S. military’s Central Command in its statement also said it hit “Iranian military coastal surveillance and air defense facilities, maritime capabilities and missile and drone storage sites.” 
It said the attack was designed to degrade Iran's ability to control the Strait of Hormuz and “swiftly punish Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces,” a key power base in Iran's theocracy that controls its ballistic missile arsenal. 
Footage released by the U.S. military appeared to show strikes carried out by fighter jets and by Tomahawk cruise missiles launched from the sea. 
One target site appeared to be in a valley of a mountainous region. 
The Guard often has missile bases and other military equipment tucked into mountain ranges. 
An Iranian attack on a base in Jordan killed two American service members, left one missing and four requiring hospitalization, the U.S. military said on Saturday. 
Since the war began, 16 U.S. service members have been killed and over 430 wounded. 
Iranian authorities said on Sunday that at least 50 people have been killed and 517 wounded in the latest U.S. strikes. 
Iran has provided no overall information on its materiel losses in the American campaign, which is now in its eighth day as the nations vie over control of the Strait of Hormuz, the narrow mouth of the Persian Gulf through which a fifth of all oil and natural gas traded passes in peacetime. 
Iran’s atomic energy agency said that U.S. strikes early on Sunday morning targeted a construction site of a planned nuclear power plant in southwest Iran, according to Iranian state television. 
Satellite images from Planet Labs PBC of the planned site of the Darkhovin Nuclear Power Plant show earth clearing but very little construction having taken place there as of July 9. 
There is no radiological material known to be at the site, which Iran had not previously announced as targeted throughout the war. 
The United States' regional allies activated their air defenses or reported incoming Iranian attacks on Sunday as the reignited conflict spilled further across the region. 
Israel said on Sunday that Iran has launched missiles toward neighboring Jordan, warning people to expect the first air raid sirens in weeks. 
It said Iran launched missiles toward the nearby Jordanian port city of Aqaba. 
Israel, which joined the United States in launching the war with airstrikes on Iran on Feb. 28, has refrained from reentering the renewed fighting. 
Iran has focused its attacks on U.S.-allied Arab states in the Gulf as well as Jordan. 
But an Iranian strike on Israeli territory could risk widening the conflict once again. 
Kuwait said on Sunday that one of the country's power and water desalination plants was attacked for the second time in two days, causing fires. 
Its Ministry of Electricity, Water and Renewable Energy said that the power grid remains stable, yet the attack marked the latest instance in which strikes  by both the United States and Iran  have targeted civilian infrastructure relied on by millions of people. 
In Kuwait, about 90% of drinking water comes from desalination. 
The secretary-general of the six-nation Gulf Cooperation Council, Jasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi, accused Iran of war crimes for strikes on infrastructure and civilian facilities. 
International humanitarian law generally protects civilian infrastructure, such as bridges and power plants, from attack, but such sites can lose these protections if used for military purposes. 
In such cases, attacks must be proportionate and minimize harm to civilians. 
Trump has threatened to target Iran’s power stations and bridges to try to compel Tehran to loosen its hold on the Strait of Hormuz. 
Recent attacks suggest the U.S. military is carrying out that plan, beginning first with coastal areas of Iran on the strait. 
The U.S. in the past week also reimposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports to halt its shipments of crude oil, and the military on Saturday said it had redirected five ships and disabled one since then. 
Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, in a statement Saturday, warned of “unforgettable lessons” if the U.S. keeps attacking the Islamic Republic. 
An Iranian negotiator said Tehran was suspending its commitments to the interim deal signed about a month ago and aimed at permanently ending the fighting. 
Iran’s joint military command said that U.S. “covetousness, bullying, totalitarianism or brutality” would meet with a “devastating response.” 
__ Metz reported from Ramallah, West Bank. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.8%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 4.0%ABC News: 2.2%Confirmation Bias9.8%This article: 7.1%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 2.4%ABC News: 0.7%Anchoring Bias7.1%This article: 9.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 4.8%ABC News: 3.0%Availability Heuristic9.0%This article: 5.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.0%This article: 2.4%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 15.1%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 8.0%ABC News: 6.8%Framing Effect15.1%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 1.9%ABC News: 1.0%Pessimism Bias4.0%This article: 46.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 20.8%ABC News: 7.7%Negativity Bias46.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.8%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 3.9%ABC News: 1.3%Recency Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 1.3%ABC News: 0.5%Ad Hominem2.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.9%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 6.0%ABC News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority17.9%This article: 2.7%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.9%False Dilemma2.7%This article: 1.6%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 0.3%Slippery Slope1.6%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.6%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.5%ABC News: 2.8%Hasty Generalization1.6%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.7%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 8.4%ABC News: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion13.7%This article: 2.8%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.9%ABC News: 0.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 2.4%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.4%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 4.9%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 1.6%ABC News: 0.2%Composition/Division4.9%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.5%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.8%ABC News: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.5%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.5%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 5.8%ABC News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote17.5%This article: 7.5%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 4.0%ABC News: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection7.5%This article: 5.2%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 1.7%ABC News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%JON GAMBRELL Associated Press: 0.0%ABC News: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

892 words analyzed.

Speakers

11speakers42%attributed speech515writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. military’s Central Command • 28 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. military’s Central Command • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. military • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageIranian authorities • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s atomic energy agency • 30 words • 100.0% coveragePlanet Labs PBC • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageIsrael • 23 words • 100.0% coverageIsrael • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageKuwait • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMinistry of Electricity, Water and Renewable Energy • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. military • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMojtaba Khamenei • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageIran’s joint military command • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mojtaba Khamenei

100%flagged-word coverage
21 attributed words5.6% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mojtaba Khamenei: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+95.3 ptsWriter: 4.7%Mojtaba Khamenei: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Mojtaba Khamenei: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.