Topic summary
78% 183 analyzed articles/videos 114,362 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Middle East Conflict results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 71,496 hits . Analysis detected 644,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 617,104 analyzed words across 183 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,202 of 15,269 topics). This Middle East Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Middle East Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 617,104
Article count: 183
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score183 analyzed articles617.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst