Author summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The National News Desk results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 4,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,292 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,112 of 6,200 authors). This The National News Desk is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. The National News Desk
Author details
Total words: 5,292
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.1% 11.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst