Publication summary
⁠37%1 analyzed article/video521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WLUK results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (124 of 410 publications). This WLUK is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
WLUK
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
⁠1%Brookings1%
⁠1%Capital B News1%
⁠1%The Banner1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠70%WLUK (selected)3%
⁠99%Utah Hockey Club13%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 9.4%9.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Publication 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Publication 12.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos