Publication summary
37% 1 analyzed article/video 521 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WLUK results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 2,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 70% (125 of 408 publications). This WLUK is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,164
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 12.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst