Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These CAITLYN FROLO results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 236 hits . Analysis detected 1,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This CAITLYN FROLO is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. CAITLYN FROLO
Author details
Total words: 1,128
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 10.1% 10.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.9% 12.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 20.9% 20.9% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 12.9% 12.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 20.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 12.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 11.5%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Composition/Division: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst