Author summary
⁠25%5 analyzed articles/videos3,841 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Cook results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,941 hits. Analysis detected 15,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,618 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (5,422 of 6,348 authors). This Ellie Cook is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Ellie Cook
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠15%Ellie Cook (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,618
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510014.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos