Author summary
41% 10 analyzed articles/videos 7,621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Mollman results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 3,483 hits . Analysis detected 27,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,773 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,849 of 6,485 authors). This Steve Mollman is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Steve Mollman
Author details
Total words: 37,773
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles37.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst