Speaker summary
49% 102 analyzed articles/videos 2,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ICE results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 418.739 hits . Analysis detected 4,123.696 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,175 analyzed words across 102 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,501 of 26,790 speakers). This ICE is better (less manipulative) than 98.90% of the peer group. ICE
Speaker details
Total words: 2,175
Article count: 102
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.1% percentile 3.6% BS Score102 analyzed videos2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 11.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst