Author summary
70% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Parra results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 842 hits . Analysis detected 7,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,288 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,591 of 6,169 authors). This Daniel Parra is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group. Daniel Parra
Author details
Total words: 9,288
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.8% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst