Publication summary
54% 21 analyzed articles/videos 13,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Limits results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Indoctrination , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 6,048 hits . Analysis detected 57,814 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,930 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (240 of 379 publications). This City Limits is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 65,930
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score21 analyzed articles65.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst