BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,205 faulty-reasoning hits from 833 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.5% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,424 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.30% of the article peer group.

The federal government passed its first housing bill in decades, finally taking up some of the solutions already tested in New York City. 
But don’t expect a big impact on affordability anytime soon. 
A home under construction last year on Staten Island. 
(Adi Talwar/City Limits) 
Congress is waking up to the fact that there’s a housing crisis. 
Lawmakers in Washington passed their first piece of housing legislation in a decade, which took effect earlier this week—without the president’s signature. 
As New Yorkers know all too well, the cost of housing is reaching new highs in big cities. 
The new bill looks to encourage new development and make it slightly easier for some people to use public housing assistance, while also allowing more conversions of public housing to private management. 
But housing policy is largely hyperlocal. 
Zoning, permitting, and other decisions that impact what gets built, and where, are often in the hands of city lawmakers. 
Now Congress is hoping to encourage some of the strategies that have become more popular in New York in recent years: loosening zoning restrictions and subsidizing the construction of new affordable housing. 
But don’t expect the 21st Century Road to Housing Act to translate into savings for New Yorkers anytime soon. 
The reforms are modest and may take a few years to kick in, experts warned. 
“I think it’s exciting that there is interest,” said Yonah Freemark, a principal research associate at the Urban Institute. 
“Realistically, there’s a problem with over-enthusiasm in some ways from the federal government about what it has done here. 
It’s not as big of a change.” 
Here are a few things the law includes: 
It increases the cap on the number of public housing properties that the federal government can convert to Section 8 vouchers. 
But it’s not clear yet how that will affect New York City, where this controversial tool is called PACT . 
The city has already converted 37,000 units and the mayor’s housing plan puts thousands more in the pipeline. 
The bill eliminates some duplicative inspections for Section 8 vouchers, which may save participants and landlords time and money when they’re using vouchers in new apartments. 
The bill also makes it easier to use some federal funding sources for new housing construction— HOME and CDBG funds. 
That money could help the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development hit Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s goal of building 200,000 units of affordable housing over the next 10 years . 
It encourages the use of manufactured homes, which have limited use in New York City, but have been used in some of the outer boroughs . 
Those changes could take a few years to take effect, experts say. 
It restricts the ability of investors to buy single family homes, a practice that was not all that common in the city, but was a strategy used by at least one investor group looking to rent Brooklyn brownstones. 
Here’s what else happened in housing this week— 
ICYMI, from City Limits: 
The Mamdani administration released a plan that officials say will address the most common issues facing tenants , crafted based on feedback officials heard during the mayor’s “Rental Ripoff” hearings this spring. 
The city’s latest housing vs. parking battle is playing out at an East Village Mitchell-Lama co-op , where the board is considering the sale to raise money for their 60-year-old buildings. 
Supporters say it could be a sign of things to come for affordable housing that needs preservation funds. 
New York State’s Department of Housing and Community Renewal o pened the waitlist for more than two dozen Project-Based Section 8 affordable buildings in the city this week, and will take applications from eligible households until July 24. 
Plans to demolish and rebuild 2,000 public housing apartments in Manhattan’s Chelsea neighborhood are back on again, after a court lifted a nearly four-month long temporary restraining order . 
ICYMI, from other local newsrooms: 
Staff at two of the city’s major legal services nonprofits went on strike this week over wages and benefits, which could disrupt access to representation for New Yorkers in criminal, family and housing courts, according to The City Reporter . 
The City Council approved the Monitor Point project, which is expected to build more than 1,300 apartments along the Brooklyn waterfront, Greenpointers reports . 
The engineering firm behind the office-to-housing conversion project that collapsed in Midtown last week says the developer failed to install reinforcing steel to support two of the building’s columns, according to Gothamist . 
What to know about the Upper East Side’s Legionella building list, via Patch. 
State Sen. 
Luis Sepúlveda told Hell Gate that he’ll continue to chair the Senate’s powerful Judiciary Committee , despite criticism about his side gig as a private housing court lawyer (where he’s missed court appearances for clients facing eviction, as City Limits previously reported, and got into a spat with a judge earlier this spring). 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Jeanmarie Evelly: 4.4%City Limits: 3.9%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 3.2%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.2%City Limits: 1.0%Anchoring Bias3.2%This article: 13.2%Jeanmarie Evelly: 3.2%City Limits: 3.2%Availability Heuristic13.2%This article: 7.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.9%City Limits: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic7.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.4%City Limits: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.4%City Limits: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Jeanmarie Evelly: 5.2%City Limits: 5.9%Framing Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.0%City Limits: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.1%City Limits: 1.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.4%City Limits: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.3%Jeanmarie Evelly: 4.4%City Limits: 4.0%Optimism Bias11.3%This article: 4.3%Jeanmarie Evelly: 2.0%City Limits: 1.9%Pessimism Bias4.3%This article: 23.6%Jeanmarie Evelly: 8.8%City Limits: 8.6%Negativity Bias23.6%This article: 3.8%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.6%City Limits: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias3.8%This article: 4.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.0%City Limits: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error4.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.1%City Limits: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.2%City Limits: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.4%City Limits: 1.4%Halo Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.0%City Limits: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 14.6%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.0%City Limits: 1.1%Recency Bias14.6%This article: 2.8%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.4%City Limits: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.6%City Limits: 0.6%Ad Hominem6.4%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 4.1%City Limits: 4.2%Appeal to Authority11.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 2.0%City Limits: 2.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.4%City Limits: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.4%City Limits: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.6%Jeanmarie Evelly: 3.6%City Limits: 3.6%Hasty Generalization4.6%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.3%City Limits: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.8%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.5%City Limits: 0.5%Bandwagon3.8%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 5.7%City Limits: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 1.3%City Limits: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.6%Jeanmarie Evelly: 2.5%City Limits: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.6%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.5%City Limits: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.3%City Limits: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.2%Jeanmarie Evelly: 2.9%City Limits: 3.4%Anecdotal2.2%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.2%City Limits: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.9%City Limits: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.0%City Limits: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.2%City Limits: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.0%City Limits: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.1%City Limits: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.0%City Limits: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.8%City Limits: 0.9%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.8%City Limits: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 13.7%Jeanmarie Evelly: 5.0%City Limits: 5.1%Biased Writer Voice13.7%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 5.1%City Limits: 4.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 2.7%City Limits: 2.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.0%City Limits: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeanmarie Evelly: 0.5%City Limits: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

833 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers25%attributed speech621writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAdi Talwar • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageYonah Freemark • 19 words • 100.0% coverageYonah Freemark • 19 words • 0.0% coverageYonah Freemark • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageNew York State’s Department of Housing and Community Renewal • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageThe City Reporter • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageGothamist • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLuis Sepúlveda • 53 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Luis Sepúlveda

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words25% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+90.2 ptsWriter: 9.8%Luis Sepúlveda: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.