Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Project Based Section 8 results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,499 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Project Based Section 8 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Project Based Section 8
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Project Based Section 8 (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,499
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos