Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Mitchell Lama Co Op results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 215 hits . Analysis detected 1,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,499 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Mitchell Lama Co Op is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Mitchell Lama Co Op
Keyword details
Total words: 2,499
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst