Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Public Housing Management results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,693 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,499 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Public Housing Management is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Public Housing Management
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
⁠0%Public Housing Management (selected)0%
Topic details
Total words: 2,499
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos