Author summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Danielle Chemtob results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 338 hits . Analysis detected 2,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,133 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 6,263 authors). This Danielle Chemtob is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Danielle Chemtob
Author details
Total words: 2,133
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 15.8% 15.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Productā¦ Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 15.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst