Author summary
27%1 analyzed article/video2,141 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ed Lavandera results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,016 hits. Analysis detected 3,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,599 of 6,263 authors). This Ed Lavandera is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Ed Lavandera
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
27%Ed Lavandera (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,572
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510026.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.8%11.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos