Author summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video2,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apurva Mahajan results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,636 hits. Analysis detected 5,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,842 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (4,298 of 6,204 authors). This Apurva Mahajan is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Apurva Mahajan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠31%Apurva Mahajan (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,842
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.8%9.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 20.9%20.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 20.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos