Topic summary
40% 34 analyzed articles/videos 25,138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renewable Energy results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 7,997 hits . Analysis detected 80,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 111,336 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (15,712 of 16,562 topics). This Renewable Energy is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Renewable Energy
Topic details
Total words: 111,336
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score34 analyzed articles111.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst