Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These New Haven Independent results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,803 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This New Haven Independent is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. New Haven Independent
Author details
Total words: 1,803
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.1% 5.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst