Author summary
88% 1 analyzed article/video 856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 246 hits . Analysis detected 1,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,250 of 6,394 authors). This Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Lila Seidman Los Angeles Times
Author details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.6% 5.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 9.0% 9.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 9.6% 9.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst