Topic summary
31% 22 analyzed articles/videos 6,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison Square Garden results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 5,139 hits . Analysis detected 43,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,664 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,421 of 15,327 topics). This Madison Square Garden is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Madison Square Garden
Topic details
Total words: 58,664
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score22 analyzed articles58.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst