Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jen Chaney results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 973 hits. Analysis detected 6,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (2,628 of 6,228 authors). This Jen Chaney is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Jen Chaney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠58%Jen Chaney (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,768
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.8% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.3%11.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 16.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Author 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos