Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roisin O'Connor results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 398 hits. Analysis detected 2,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,045 of 6,244 authors). This Roisin O'Connor is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Roisin O'Connor
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
36%Roisin O'Connor (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,824
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos