Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ellie Muir results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Horn Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 1,067 hits . Analysis detected 4,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,266 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (3,883 of 6,215 authors). This Ellie Muir is better (less manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Ellie Muir
Author details
Total words: 7,266
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.7% 14.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 12.6% 12.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.7%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst