Author summary
0% 17 analyzed articles/videos 20,365 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Treisman results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 9,651 hits . Analysis detected 69,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,010 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,366 of 6,258 authors). This Rachel Treisman is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Rachel Treisman
Author details
Total words: 84,010
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score17 analyzed articles84K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst