Author summary
44% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,036 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Romo results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 1,466 hits . Analysis detected 9,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,568 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (4,023 of 6,162 authors). This Vanessa Romo is better (less manipulative) than 65.30% of the peer group. Vanessa Romo
Author details
Total words: 10,568
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst