Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Mann results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,727 hits . Analysis detected 14,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,314 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (4,951 of 6,134 authors). This Brian Mann is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Brian Mann
Author details
Total words: 19,314
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst