Author summary
48% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Baum results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,180 hits . Analysis detected 7,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,120 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,359 of 6,363 authors). This Sophia Baum is better (less manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group. Sophia Baum
Author details
Total words: 8,120
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.2% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.6% 9.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst