Topic summary
59% 15 analyzed articles/videos 9,700 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leadership results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 3,602 hits . Analysis detected 43,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,786 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,383 of 15,646 topics). This Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 41,786
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score15 analyzed articles41.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.9% 5.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst