Author summary
77%4 analyzed articles/videos2,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pjotr Sauer results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 2,160 hits. Analysis detected 14,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,951 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,439 of 6,170 authors). This Pjotr Sauer is better (less manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group.
Pjotr Sauer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%Pjotr Sauer (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,951
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 15.5%15.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.2%3.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.2%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate