Mykhailo Drapatyi: Ukrainians hope new commander will end army’s ‘Soviet culture’ 68%

By Pjotr Sauer78%

7/22/2026, 10:48:02 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 991 faulty-reasoning hits from 584 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of 68% (7,113 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 67.50% of the article peer group.

Through a haze of smoke, a lone Ukrainian armoured vehicle suddenly burst into view. 
The BMP-2 accelerated towards a barricade of tyres and debris, smashing through it in seconds as protesters scattered. 
Behind the controls, on the chaotic streets of Mariupol on 9 May 2014, was a little-known officer named Mykhailo Drapatyi. 
The footage became one of the defining images of Russia’s first attempt to seize eastern Ukraine, and made Drapatyi one of Ukraine’s military heroes. 
Twelve years later, he has the top job. 
On Tuesday night, the president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, named the 43-year-old major general as the commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s armed forces, putting him at the head of the military as Kyiv tries to shift the momentum of the war. 
The appointment was one of the few wartime decisions in Ukraine to command near-universal support, reflecting Drapatyi’s high standing across the country’s political, military and civil society circles, and helping to steady the political mood after days of turmoil in Kyiv. 
Drapatyi belongs to a younger generation of Ukrainian commanders formed by more than a decade of fighting, and built his reputation on the frontline. 
Supporters say he took up drone warfare early, and pushed authority down to junior officers and expected them to answer for their own decisions. 
Perhaps more importantly for many Ukrainians, he represents a break with the Soviet-style command culture soldiers associated with Syrskyi, whom critics accused of relying on costly frontal assaults and spending soldiers’ lives too freely. 
“[Drapatyi] is a critic of Soviet-style thinking and micromanagement, and he recognises the problems with lying inside the military,” said Rob Lee, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute. 
Bielieskov described Drapatyi as “humane and open to dialogue”  qualities he said were unusual among Ukraine’s senior military leadership. 
He said Drapatyi commanded respect among both career officers and those who joined the military after 2022, because he had risen through the ranks on merit and understood the realities of the battlefield. 
Drapatyi has also been unusually outspoken about the need to reform the army’s internal culture. 
In a social media post last year, he criticised what he described as “an atmosphere of fear, lack of initiative, [and] imperviousness to feedback”, arguing that such attitudes undermined the military’s effectiveness. 
After a Russian missile strike on a training ground killed dozens of soldiers under his command, Drapatyi publicly accepted responsibility and offered his resignation rather than shift the blame on to subordinates  a gesture that won him widespread admiration and reinforced his reputation as one of Ukraine’s most accountable commanders. 
“President Zelenskyy made the best possible choice,” said the Ukrainian military analyst and veteran who writes under the pseudonym Tatarigami. 
“It will take time for changes to take effect. 
But I know many soldiers have renewed hope for change, and that is very important for morale.” 
Analysts warn, however, that expectations may have run ahead of what the job allows. 
Drapatyi is expected to improve battlefield management and the army’s day-to-day functioning. 
But many of Ukraine’s most pressing wartime challenges lay beyond the authority of any commander-in-chief, said Bielieskov. 
Long-running tensions between the defence ministry and the general staff remained unresolved, while the politically fraught issue of mobilisation reform continued to weigh on the war effort, Bielieskov said. 
“There is a risk that in six months he will be blamed for problems he cannot fully control. 
Many of the biggest challenges facing Ukraine lie outside his mandate.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 11.8%Pjotr Sauer: 6.0%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias11.8%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.7%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Pjotr Sauer: 4.3%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic7.2%This article: 4.1%Pjotr Sauer: 2.0%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.1%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.2%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 1.6%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Pjotr Sauer: 4.8%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 2.9%Pjotr Sauer: 0.7%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.9%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Pjotr Sauer: 1.1%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 5.5%Pjotr Sauer: 4.6%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 5.5%Pjotr Sauer: 15.5%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias5.5%This article: 8.7%Pjotr Sauer: 1.7%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 10.6%Pjotr Sauer: 1.4%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error10.6%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.8%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Pjotr Sauer: 0.2%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 25.9%Pjotr Sauer: 3.2%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect25.9%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 1.8%the Guardian: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Pjotr Sauer: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.4%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.1%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.7%Pjotr Sauer: 6.6%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority8.7%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 3.1%Pjotr Sauer: 1.7%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.1%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.0%Pjotr Sauer: 9.9%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization7.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 7.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.9%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon7.0%This article: 5.8%Pjotr Sauer: 4.6%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 5.5%Pjotr Sauer: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question5.5%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 4.2%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.6%Pjotr Sauer: 4.7%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal11.6%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 2.8%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.9%Pjotr Sauer: 8.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote13.9%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 1.1%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.9%Pjotr Sauer: 3.3%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice1.9%This article: 3.1%Pjotr Sauer: 0.7%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination3.1%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Pjotr Sauer: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

584 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers18%attributed speech478writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageRob Lee • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBielieskov • 17 words • 0.0% coverageBielieskov • 29 words • 0.0% coverageBielieskov • 18 words • 0.0% coverageBielieskov • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bielieskov

85%flagged-word coverage
75 attributed words71% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%Bielieskov: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Bielieskov: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Bielieskov: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.