Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos1,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Reform results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 817 hits. Analysis detected 5,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,002 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (11,046 of 16,562 topics). This Military Reform is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
Military Reform
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,002
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.7%11.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos