Author summary
75% 1 analyzed article/video 1,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ani Chkhikvadze results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 4,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,250 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (4,108 of 6,628 authors). This Ani Chkhikvadze is better (less manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Ani Chkhikvadze
Author details
Total words: 5,250
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst