Publication summary
24% 34 analyzed articles/videos 21,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice of San Diego results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 10,482 hits . Analysis detected 81,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 114,662 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 22% (320 of 410 publications). This Voice of San Diego is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 114,662
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score34 analyzed articles114.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst