Author summary
30%11 analyzed articles/videos4,886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice of San Diego results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 3,049 hits. Analysis detected 23,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,305 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,719 of 6,394 authors). This Voice of San Diego is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Voice of San Diego
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
11%Voice of San Diego (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 32,305
Article count: 11
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
1.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles32.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate