Publication summary
26% 28 analyzed articles/videos 14,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voice of San Diego results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 8,587 hits . Analysis detected 68,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 92,201 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (295 of 379 publications). This Voice of San Diego is better (less manipulative) than 77.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 92,201
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score28 analyzed articles92.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst