Author summary
38% 3 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Huntsberry results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 1,271 hits . Analysis detected 7,243 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,108 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,749 of 6,628 authors). This Will Huntsberry is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Will Huntsberry
Author details
Total words: 7,108
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.9% 17.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst