Author summary
64%1 analyzed article/video741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Lewis results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 228 hits. Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 55% (2,980 of 6,628 authors). This Scott Lewis is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Scott Lewis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
55%Scott Lewis (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

55% percentile
025507510055.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.3%10.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos