Author summary
35% 1 analyzed article/video 762 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MacKenzie Elmer results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 416 hits . Analysis detected 1,636 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,286 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,350 of 6,235 authors). This MacKenzie Elmer is better (less manipulative) than 53.70% of the peer group. MacKenzie Elmer
Author details
Total words: 2,286
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst