Author summary
40% 3 analyzed articles/videos 413 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadia Lathan results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 832 hits . Analysis detected 7,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,257 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,182 of 6,350 authors). This Nadia Lathan is better (less manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Nadia Lathan
Author details
Total words: 10,257
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.4% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst