Author summary
31% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CalMatters results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 5,412 hits . Analysis detected 40,191 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,300 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (5,889 of 6,134 authors). This CalMatters is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. CalMatters
Author details
Total words: 64,300
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles64.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst