Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 1,500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ana B. Ibarra results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 3,054 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,738 of 6,163 authors). This Ana B. Ibarra is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Ana B. Ibarra
Author details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst