Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Anat Rubin results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 458 hits . Analysis detected 2,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,162 authors). This Anat Rubin is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Anat Rubin
Author details
Total words: 3,212
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.3% 14.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.2% 13.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Primacy Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst