Author summary
37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeanne Kuang results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,423 hits. Analysis detected 6,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,736 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (5,214 of 6,163 authors). This Jeanne Kuang is better (less manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Jeanne Kuang
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
16%Jeanne Kuang (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,736
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.4% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 14.6%14.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos