Aguirre: County Should Pay to Treat the Whole Tijuana River 29%

By Voice of San Diego31%

7/13/2026, 2:15:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 248 hits. Analysis detected 1,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 849 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.4% and a BS Rank of 29% (15,603 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the article peer group.

We’ve been wondering how the county would spend $80 million per year on the sewage-plagued Tijuana River under a proposed half-cent sales tax measure proposed by the San Diego County Supervisors. 
On Friday, Supervisor Paloma Aguirre (the issue’s main champion and former mayor of sewage-blighted Imperial Beach) put out her proposed plan. 
Main message? 
Convert a large chunk of that money into a bond (a big loan governments often take out to finance expensive projects) and have the county build a system that treats the entire Tijuana River. 
It’s also known as the “river diversion” project and Aguirre’s been pushing for it since she was mayor. 
That basically involves running the river on the United States side through a new treatment plant (called advanced primary treatment) so that raw sewage doesn’t make its way to the Pacific Ocean (and Imperial Beach). 
The U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency ranked river diversion as the third priority project (out of three) to do on the United States side, largely because it’s expensive to do, as our MacKenzie Elmer has previously reported. 
But, at the time of the EPA’s study in 2021, it was the only option that would keep the beaches of Imperial Beach open the longest. 
Now with potentially hundreds of millions of dollars from a new sales tax-supported bond (if voters approve it), the county might just have the bones to build it. 
However, it could also mean the county would be on the hook for taking care of such a treatment plant. 
If the federally-owned one at the U.S.-Mexico border that already struggles to clean Tijuana sewage (and sometimes river water) is an example, we know that’s a huge undertaking with many legal battles. 
Politics Report: City Hall’s Death Spiral 
City Hall cuts services to balance the budget. 
Voters get angry. 
City Hall asks for new revenue for services. 
The voters say no. 
This is starting to feel like a death spiral, writes our Will Huntsberry. 
Last month, San Diego City Council had to cut $100 million in spending. 
The city closed half the public restrooms in Mission Beach to help get there. 
And now people are complaining. 
Any political leader who wants to be truly effective  rather than just hold office  will have to find a way to break the cycle, he writes. 
Also: Does building more apartments really drive down rent prices? 
Huntsberry is skeptical. 
Read the full Politics Report if you subscribe as a member, here. 
Sacramento Report: Big Condo Push 
Condos are the cheapest path to homeownership in California, but fewer and fewer are getting built and bought. 
State lawmakers have been looking at two different ways to fix this by making condo construction less costly and risky for developers. 
One made it out of committee, the other one didn’t. 
The first bill targets a 20-year-old law that let condo owners sue developers over construction defects which had spiraled into a lawsuit industry driving up building costs. 
The idea is to loosen that liability by protecting developers from lawsuits one year after they repair a defect. 
The second bill came from San Diego Assemblymember Chris Ward, who proposed letting developers keep more of a buyer’s deposit if the buyer backs out of the deal. 
This bill made Democrats worried it put too much financial risk on everyday buyers. 
Ward ended up pulling the bill himself. 
Read the Sacramento Report here. 
VOSD Podcast: Plug-in Blues 
Rooftop solar is all the rage, but what if you don’t own the space above your home? 
Environment reporter MacKenzie Elmer joins our hosts on the latest episode to discuss a proposed bill that would make it easier for renters and condo owners to get energy from the sun. 
Listen to the latest episode here. 
In Other News 
Correction: We updated the South County Report to correct that the opening of a Holocaust exhibit at the Central Library in San Diego is on Sept. 
29. 
Here’s the updated post. 
San Diego County’s animal shelters have chronic, long-known problems that a new report confirms, but the newly appointed director says she’s committed to actually fixing them this time as she points to early progress and a new shelter facility as reasons for optimism. 
( KPBS ) 
A court ruling striking down parts of San Diego’s street vendor law forced the city to stop enforcing it altogether, letting vendors return to previously restricted areas like La Jolla’s beaches. 
This comeback is reigniting complaints from La Jolla community groups, who want tighter regulation, with no clear resolution in sight. 
( Union Tribune ) 
A four-year Scripps Institution of Oceanography study found that ground sensors can successfully predict San Diego coastal cliff collapses hours to days in advance. 
This breakthrough could lead to an early, public warning system and potentially prevent fatal bluff collapses. 
( KPBS ) 
The Morning Report was written by MacKenzie Elmer and Naomi Granata. 
It was edited by Andrea Sanchez-Villafaña. 
The post Aguirre: County Should Pay to Treat the Whole Tijuana River appeared first on Voice of San Diego . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.2%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Confirmation Bias20.8%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias2.8%This article: 10.0%Voice of San Diego: 8.8%Voice of San Diego: 6.1%Framing Effect10.0%This article: 2.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Loss Aversion2.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect2.1%This article: 20.6%Voice of San Diego: 3.1%Voice of San Diego: 3.0%Optimism Bias20.6%This article: 4.1%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.4%Pessimism Bias4.1%This article: 23.4%Voice of San Diego: 9.2%Voice of San Diego: 9.1%Negativity Bias23.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.9%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%In-Group Bias1.6%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.8%Voice of San Diego: 1.5%Halo Effect7.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.1%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 2.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Primacy Effect2.1%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.0%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 3.0%Appeal to Authority12.0%This article: 9.9%Voice of San Diego: 1.2%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%False Dilemma9.9%This article: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.7%Slippery Slope1.5%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.6%Voice of San Diego: 3.2%Voice of San Diego: 4.2%Hasty Generalization12.6%This article: 3.7%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Red Herring3.7%This article: 2.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Bandwagon2.0%This article: 5.8%Voice of San Diego: 3.5%Voice of San Diego: 4.0%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 2.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.6%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 5.1%Voice of San Diego: 1.9%Voice of San Diego: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.1%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 3.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Burden of Proof3.3%This article: 4.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.1%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 2.3%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.1%Voice of San Diego: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%Voice of San Diego: 2.6%Voice of San Diego: 1.6%Unattributed Quote3.8%This article: 0.2%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Voice of San Diego: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.2%This article: 29.2%Voice of San Diego: 9.4%Voice of San Diego: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice29.2%This article: 7.3%Voice of San Diego: 1.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Indoctrination7.3%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.3%Voice of San Diego: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Voice of San Diego: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Voice of San Diego: 2.5%Voice of San Diego: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

849 words analyzed.

Speakers

9speakers27%attributed speech623writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coveragePaloma Aguirre • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWill Huntsberry • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWill Huntsberry • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageChris Ward • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageChris Ward • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageMacKenzie Elmer • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSan Diego County • 43 words • 100.0% coverageKPBS • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageUnion Tribune • 4 words • 0.0% coverageScripps Institution of Oceanography • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKPBS • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageVoice of San Diego • 20 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

San Diego County

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words19% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+72.6 ptsWriter: 27.4%San Diego County: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%San Diego County: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%San Diego County: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%San Diego County: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%San Diego County: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.