Author summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Gail C. Christopher results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 353 hits . Analysis detected 3,944 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,483 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,536 of 6,194 authors). This Dr. Gail C. Christopher is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Dr. Gail C. Christopher
Author details
Total words: 3,483
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.9% 4.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Bandwagon: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst