Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Tigist Layne results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 2,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,500 authors). This Tigist Layne is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Tigist Layne
Author details
Total words: 3,804
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 8.7% 8.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.2% 10.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst