Author summary
94% 1 analyzed article/video 2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew O'Brien results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,097 hits . Analysis detected 7,198 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,293 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,657 of 6,617 authors). This Andrew O'Brien is better (less manipulative) than 55.30% of the peer group. Andrew O'Brien
Author details
Total words: 7,293
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.7% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.0% 15.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.7% 6.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Author 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst